Episode
19

The Shifting Landscape of Provider Reporting

How is provider reporting evolving in today’s 340B environment? Recorded live from the conference floor, this episode of 340Banter brings together co-host Logan Yoho and guest co-host Felicity Homsted to unpack the shifting landscape that covered entities are facing. From new reporting requirements to the impact of technology and data management.

Our Guest on This Episode

our team image
Felicity Homsted
CEO, FQHC 340B Compliance

Felicity Homsted works with health centers across the country to manage and improve their 340B and pharmacy programs. Felicity is the creator and host of 340B Ladies Who Lunch and Learn Webinar Series, for women in 340B to learn, grown and build community. Dr. Homsted is also a Co-Lead Investigator for the National Institute on Drug Abuse - Clinical Trials Network Research Study CTN-0116: Pharmacist-Integrated Collaborative Model of Medication Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder.

Prior to transitioning into the consulting space to support more entities nationally, Dr. Homsted was Chief Pharmacy Officer for Penobscot Community Health Center, Maine’s largest FQHC. She was responsible for the administration of four pharmacies, integrated pharmacy services, and two accredited pharmacy residency programs. She served as Subject Matter Expert for the Apexus 340B Prime Vendor Program, Apexus 340B University Faculty, and Apexus 340B Operations Certificate modules author.

View/Hide Transcript

Full Episode Transcript

00:00:00.017 --> 00:00:05.377Today on 340 Banter, we're live from the 340B Midwest Regional Conference.00:00:05.777 --> 00:00:10.457I'm joined by Felicity. Chelsea couldn't be with us today, but today we want00:00:10.457 --> 00:00:15.377to talk a little bit about what we've been seeing in the states around provider reporting.00:00:15.797 --> 00:00:21.117I know both of our states, Maine and Ohio, have seen quite a bit of changes00:00:21.117 --> 00:00:24.897here recently. Let's talk about what we're really seeing with that.00:00:45.041 --> 00:00:49.121Awesome. Thank you for having me here. It has been wonderful to make the00:00:49.121 --> 00:00:53.521trip from Maine, and I did not have any trouble with my flight. So that was amazing.00:00:53.801 --> 00:00:59.421We have had a lot of work around 340B lately in Maine.00:00:59.641 --> 00:01:03.921We were a little bit late starting, and we started with transparency,00:01:04.221 --> 00:01:09.981womp womp, in our state. We took a little bit of a different pathway00:01:09.981 --> 00:01:11.121from some of the other states.00:01:11.281 --> 00:01:14.521Most states have started with protections, and we started with transparency.00:01:14.961 --> 00:01:18.941We were a little bit different there, too, where we started more along the lines00:01:18.941 --> 00:01:22.141of the American Hospital Association, good stewardship principles,00:01:22.141 --> 00:01:27.321more with a narrative and a calculation that focused on, you know,00:01:27.341 --> 00:01:28.981what was that true 340B savings?00:01:29.161 --> 00:01:33.501So the difference between what we would have paid on 340B and what we would00:01:33.501 --> 00:01:35.661have paid if we bought the drug at a traditional price.00:01:35.761 --> 00:01:40.521So a little bit unusual, but we've had an evolution that we'll talk about during the conversation.00:01:40.761 --> 00:01:45.621Ohio actually is going to end up following the same pathway.00:01:45.941 --> 00:01:50.101We originally had a contract pharmacy bill in the last session,00:01:50.101 --> 00:01:51.881but it didn't go anywhere.00:01:52.061 --> 00:01:59.301And then a unique thing happened, and I think this is a great topic to talk about within advocacy.00:01:59.581 --> 00:02:06.441It's a place people don't think about. We didn't have a provider transparency bill that was passed.00:02:06.641 --> 00:02:13.141As part of our budget process, our House version had nothing involving 340B transparency.00:02:13.481 --> 00:02:18.321Then, the Senate version came out with language for hospitals only.00:02:18.761 --> 00:02:19.801It went to conference committees, 00:02:20.042 --> 00:02:23.842and that's when they take both versions00:02:23.842 --> 00:02:27.122of the bill, the Senate version and House version, and they blend them together.00:02:27.302 --> 00:02:33.642When they did that at like 11 o'clock at night, they changed hospital to covered00:02:33.642 --> 00:02:35.882entity. So it now applies to everyone.00:02:36.162 --> 00:02:41.042We're in a similar boat where we're starting with transparency that starts next July,00:02:41.362 --> 00:02:47.382but we still have a contract pharmacy bill live and will possibly pass this session.00:02:47.382 --> 00:02:52.802We're hoping that we can get it passed and that I'm kind of viewing this00:02:52.802 --> 00:02:59.022in glass half full and that these transparency requirements can actually help00:02:59.022 --> 00:03:04.802us in where there's less accusations that the 340B program is opaque.00:03:04.802 --> 00:03:08.822Yeah, we definitely have had success with that in Maine.00:03:08.842 --> 00:03:14.002It was funny, our experience was that we passed the transparency legislation.00:03:14.302 --> 00:03:19.942Then the following year, we were working on our contract pharmacy protections00:03:19.942 --> 00:03:23.582and did not anticipate this.00:03:23.582 --> 00:03:28.242As we were doing our testimony for moving forward with the contract pharmacy00:03:28.242 --> 00:03:33.822protections, we had calls for more transparency, more transparency.00:03:33.822 --> 00:03:37.522We had not gotten through that. We haven't even got a report yet.00:03:37.782 --> 00:03:42.022We had not gotten through our first reporting, so it was well played.00:03:42.022 --> 00:03:46.922They did get more transparency added to our transparency reporting.00:03:47.102 --> 00:03:53.072They'll be updating now. Now ours looks both like Maine did originally,00:03:53.092 --> 00:03:55.032but adding some of the Minnesota measures.00:03:55.412 --> 00:03:59.412So looking at not just what the true savings are on what we're purchasing,00:03:59.612 --> 00:04:03.232but also adding in that margin that any retail pharmacy would have.00:04:03.232 --> 00:04:04.852So what did you sell the drug for?00:04:04.972 --> 00:04:09.532And then minusing your 340B cost from that. So it does inflate the 340B savings00:04:09.532 --> 00:04:14.032to add in a retail pharmacy margin, but then do reporting with those numbers.00:04:14.052 --> 00:04:18.292We were able to move the contract pharmacy protection process.00:04:18.917 --> 00:04:23.417A lot of it had to do with the fact that we were both protecting the state's00:04:23.417 --> 00:04:26.937safety net providers and also being transparent about what was going on.00:04:27.337 --> 00:04:31.897You mentioned Minnesota. That's the one transparency00:04:31.897 --> 00:04:35.737report that we've actually seen come out.00:04:35.797 --> 00:04:40.037So let's talk about that a little bit, and what we saw ther,e and the nuances00:04:40.037 --> 00:04:46.517with it. I would say a lot of information, but it's unclear if there's been a lot of action from it.00:04:46.617 --> 00:04:51.877I personally refer to a lot of what's coming out of these state transparency00:04:51.877 --> 00:04:55.517bills as state-funded pharma research, which is unfortunate, right?00:04:55.597 --> 00:04:59.617We do want to be transparent with what's happening in our 340B Program,00:04:59.617 --> 00:05:03.277but many of the states are not asking for narratives.00:05:03.357 --> 00:05:08.397They are asking about the numbers, but they don't tell the full story.00:05:08.537 --> 00:05:12.617Minnesota is one of those states where they've gotten lots of numbers,00:05:12.617 --> 00:05:17.317but no actual information from the covered entities coming back about the true00:05:17.317 --> 00:05:19.457importance of their 340B Programs.00:05:19.637 --> 00:05:24.137I think that's challenging for state legislators and administrators because00:05:24.137 --> 00:05:29.657they're dealing with so many topics. They don't understand the nuances00:05:29.657 --> 00:05:34.137of 340B, so getting the information from the00:05:34.419 --> 00:05:37.839the numbers is not going to make sense to them.00:05:37.999 --> 00:05:42.539I think that I'd much rather see when these bills go through,00:05:42.599 --> 00:05:46.839I'd much rather see a narrative be added to it if it's going to be there.00:05:47.439 --> 00:05:52.199When we see these come out, I think that's important when you're talking00:05:52.199 --> 00:05:57.579to legislators that you have a bill that's proposed, that you explain that this00:05:57.579 --> 00:05:59.759data doesn't mean much without context.00:05:59.759 --> 00:06:02.739It's very much like healthcare, right? What are we testing for?00:06:03.299 --> 00:06:06.619What are the results that we need to see, right?00:06:06.699 --> 00:06:10.359If you want to understand what the 340B Program is doing,00:06:10.779 --> 00:06:13.039numbers aren't going to tell the whole story.00:06:13.379 --> 00:06:16.559You have to have the narrative to go with it.00:06:16.559 --> 00:06:21.519In those transparency bills, it's really important that we have an opportunity00:06:21.519 --> 00:06:26.919to explain along with the numbers so that the legislators can understand,00:06:27.119 --> 00:06:30.359so that it becomes something meaningful and usable, right?00:06:30.419 --> 00:06:35.199If you just get a list of lab tests coming back, and you don't have the report00:06:35.199 --> 00:06:39.479that comes back from the doctor to go with it, it's not meaningful to you as a patient.00:06:39.479 --> 00:06:43.179That's very much what we're seeing in the states that are getting their reports00:06:43.179 --> 00:06:47.979back, that aren't having that narrative coming in from the covered entities00:06:47.979 --> 00:06:49.919to help with that explanation.00:06:50.219 --> 00:06:53.379We're really thinking about that.00:06:53.519 --> 00:06:58.299The other piece that we're thinking about, too, is that there are other stakeholders00:06:58.299 --> 00:07:02.359in the 340B Program who have opportunities to be transparent.00:07:02.359 --> 00:07:09.859Big kudos to Michigan, who introduced in their transparency bill this00:07:09.859 --> 00:07:14.899year, some manufacturer transparency and something for us all to think about, right?00:07:15.039 --> 00:07:19.159Because as the manufacturers are restricting the 340B Program,00:07:19.159 --> 00:07:23.719as they are pulling back those savings from the safety net in each of our states,00:07:23.959 --> 00:07:27.379where are they reinvesting? Where are those dollars going?00:07:27.659 --> 00:07:30.479I think that's00:07:31.106 --> 00:07:36.526only fair. We are equal, covered entities are equal stakeholders with manufacturers.00:07:36.786 --> 00:07:40.326So what's good for the goose is good for the gander. Yeah, we would love to00:07:40.326 --> 00:07:44.506see states having transparency measures to get explanations of,00:07:44.586 --> 00:07:49.766what is that savings now going towards? How are you supporting our communities?00:07:50.006 --> 00:07:53.526How are you expanding care for our patients? Letting us know,00:07:53.706 --> 00:07:58.486what are you now spending in our state to create access for our communities?00:07:58.486 --> 00:08:01.286Also, what are you spending on your marketing?00:08:01.526 --> 00:08:07.466What does it cost to manufacture these drugs, right? So let's have transparency all around.00:08:07.686 --> 00:08:10.346We're very much in support of transparency,00:08:10.346 --> 00:08:13.506but we think that it's important to have it for both parties.00:08:14.407 --> 00:08:18.927To build on that, what we've seen is that with the data from the Office of Pharmacy00:08:18.927 --> 00:08:21.647Affairs and the audits that they've been doing,00:08:22.127 --> 00:08:27.127manufacturers actually have a three times higher rate of repayment on audits00:08:27.127 --> 00:08:32.927to the covered entities than the covered entities do to manufacturers when there are audit findings.00:08:33.607 --> 00:08:38.207We recently just saw a manufacturer that was overcharging for the entire00:08:38.207 --> 00:08:39.987length of the 340B Program.00:08:40.147 --> 00:08:44.287Yeah, and that's disheartening, right? So from the very beginning of their participation00:08:44.287 --> 00:08:47.167in the program for the medications that they were supplying,00:08:47.387 --> 00:08:50.667they did not calculate the 340B price correctly.00:08:51.107 --> 00:08:53.907They had major repayments that they had to do.00:08:54.027 --> 00:08:58.147They went back just a little over a decade. For the rest of the time,00:08:58.307 --> 00:09:00.987which we've been in the 340B program for over three decades,00:09:01.387 --> 00:09:05.687it was, if you would like the rest of this money, please calculate it yourself and let us know.00:09:06.087 --> 00:09:11.027We, as covered entities, are held to a very high threshold.00:09:11.027 --> 00:09:17.787We believe that the transparency measures are important and should go all around.00:09:18.027 --> 00:09:22.467I would say another area that could be included in that would be the pharmacy benefit00:09:22.467 --> 00:09:28.187managers or PBM, because we're hearing more and more about their participation00:09:28.187 --> 00:09:30.687in the program and taking those savings.00:09:30.907 --> 00:09:34.827I think that would be fair as well to add. 00:09:34.947 --> 00:09:39.047We hear a lot of stories about PBMs coming in and saying what the program will00:09:39.047 --> 00:09:42.787cost if the contract pharmacy restrictions are lifted.00:09:42.947 --> 00:09:48.247Every time we ask the question, has the state seen savings00:09:48.247 --> 00:09:51.607in the last few years when the restrictions have been in place?00:09:51.607 --> 00:09:56.607Every time we ask that question, the answer has been no. It's curious that00:09:56.607 --> 00:10:01.747it will cost us more if we remove them, but we didn't save one when they were00:10:01.747 --> 00:10:04.007in place. So how does that work?00:10:04.187 --> 00:10:08.567That's the same for employers, too. They're using that same argument00:10:08.567 --> 00:10:13.027with employers that 340B makes your costs go up because you get less00:10:13.027 --> 00:10:16.387rebates, but we haven't seen their costs go down in the last five years with00:10:16.387 --> 00:10:18.207contract pharmacy restrictions. 00:10:18.449 --> 00:10:22.669It's been significant if you look at our contract pharmacy savings that00:10:22.669 --> 00:10:24.149covered entities are noticing.00:10:24.469 --> 00:10:28.569I do think that there's opportunities for transparency for all of the00:10:28.569 --> 00:10:29.829participants in the program.00:10:30.209 --> 00:10:34.169I think this is something to explore as you work on your advocacy.00:10:34.569 --> 00:10:40.349I do think it's good for us just to talk a little bit about advocacy in general,00:10:40.609 --> 00:10:48.729It's an ongoing conversation, and it's really important to be prepared when you go in.00:10:49.089 --> 00:10:54.629Yeah, exactly. What would you say if a state is coming up with advocacy00:10:54.629 --> 00:11:00.909or with a provider reporting bill, what would the advocacy discussion points,00:11:00.949 --> 00:11:02.849would you go and talk about it?00:11:02.949 --> 00:11:08.429I think what comes to mind for me is what transparency do we already have in00:11:08.429 --> 00:11:15.089place as covered entities? Yeah, and so that is something we really leveraged in Maine. 00:11:15.677 --> 00:11:19.297We talked a lot about that, right? We were able to keep the federally qualified00:11:19.297 --> 00:11:23.017health centers out of the reporting requirements because we talked about what00:11:23.017 --> 00:11:26.957we were reporting in UDS, and with our fiscal audits that we have to do annually.00:11:27.257 --> 00:11:32.277Also thinking about what is meaningful and really articulating that,00:11:32.777 --> 00:11:36.537making sure that you have the narrative in there as well, creating a strong00:11:36.537 --> 00:11:39.577coalition without creating division, right?00:11:39.657 --> 00:11:43.897We worked with the health centers and the other grantees, who work closely with the hospital.00:11:44.097 --> 00:11:49.237Even though we were able to articulate the nuances of the health centers,00:11:49.457 --> 00:11:55.177it was never in a conversation that was disparaging to another covered entity00:11:55.177 --> 00:11:56.717type. They weren't throwing them under the bus.00:11:56.957 --> 00:12:02.317This makes us unique, but no, never that this makes somebody else,00:12:02.317 --> 00:12:07.757you know, less a participant of this program, right?00:12:08.117 --> 00:12:11.817It's just that this is our federal obligation, so this is why we're doing00:12:11.817 --> 00:12:15.757this and helping others highlight how they show as well.00:12:15.937 --> 00:12:21.057I think that fiscal audit, that was something I didn't think about at first.00:12:21.057 --> 00:12:28.617I always bring up UDS, but our fiscal audit is reported to the federal government. It's published.00:12:29.057 --> 00:12:33.337Anyone can go pull up a fiscal audit from a health center,00:12:33.357 --> 00:12:37.137and it's proving that we're using the funds to meet the mission of the health center.00:12:37.137 --> 00:12:40.217We, as health centers, have a lot of transparency already.00:12:40.217 --> 00:12:46.297We have been successful in a number of states by articulating that to be able to00:12:46.657 --> 00:12:51.917support transparency, but say that we already have extensive transparency reporting,00:12:51.917 --> 00:12:54.617so we have been able to be exempted from the state requirements.00:12:54.617 --> 00:12:57.477Because again, like you said, we're already publicly published.00:12:57.817 --> 00:13:02.577Then from there, just making sure that as we're having these conversations,00:13:02.577 --> 00:13:06.757that there is a focus on yes, okay, we're having transparency, but if00:13:07.125 --> 00:13:10.345we don't have protections in the state for the contract pharmacy,00:13:10.505 --> 00:13:13.245how does this feed into that conversation as well?00:13:13.365 --> 00:13:17.725Using every moment of advocacy to help move things forward as well.00:13:17.845 --> 00:13:20.285We are fully in support of transparency.00:13:20.865 --> 00:13:24.125Here's how we're doing it. Here's what the program means to our community.00:13:24.325 --> 00:13:29.225Also, here's what the contraction of the program has meant to the community.00:13:29.385 --> 00:13:31.825How do we continue to work together? 00:13:32.065 --> 00:13:36.685I think if you have one of these bills coming up, talking about the transparency00:13:36.685 --> 00:13:41.865that we already do, being supportive of transparency is a good thing.00:13:42.085 --> 00:13:45.765We see that benefit, but we're already doing it.00:13:45.885 --> 00:13:50.545So talking about the workforce requirements, but then also talking about how00:13:50.545 --> 00:13:57.265if we're transparent, then we should be able to open that contract pharmacy access back up.00:13:57.265 --> 00:14:04.645So really talking about the impact there and how it's hurting your patients,00:14:04.785 --> 00:14:05.645which are their constituents.00:14:06.756 --> 00:14:12.296I think that's all, the whole thing is talking about how it affects the constituents.00:14:12.576 --> 00:14:16.116At the end of the day, it's the patients who are missing out.00:14:16.256 --> 00:14:19.296One of the things that was most disheartening to me,00:14:19.416 --> 00:14:23.276just as we're wrapping up, is when we were down in the state house doing00:14:23.276 --> 00:14:27.176testimony, people from different groups who were coming00:14:27.176 --> 00:14:30.076in and saying that this hasn't hurt patients.00:14:30.756 --> 00:14:38.076I was flabbergasted, and I have no poker face, so I was told not to sit in front of the camera.00:14:38.256 --> 00:14:42.996That was for a reason, because I'm sure I was all sorts of everything.00:14:43.356 --> 00:14:46.956I can't tell you, how many patients and we're,00:14:47.116 --> 00:14:53.756a step removed as consultants, how many calls we receive as the consultant,00:14:54.056 --> 00:14:58.396from our covered entities saying, we can't get this medication for our00:14:58.396 --> 00:15:02.296patients, even those from contract pharmacies, for the covered entities we work with.00:15:02.376 --> 00:15:08.456What are we supposed to do about a regular restriction00:15:08.456 --> 00:15:11.936comes in, how are we supposed to deal with this? How are we supposed to deal with this?00:15:12.056 --> 00:15:17.656Patients are being impacted because, yes, the medication is at the pharmacy,00:15:17.836 --> 00:15:21.796but especially with where we work, which is with the FQHCs.00:15:22.348 --> 00:15:27.028We were previously passing on that 340B price to the patients.00:15:27.028 --> 00:15:32.368If that's not at the pharmacy, we can't pass that on, which means the patient's00:15:32.368 --> 00:15:36.948not able to afford their medication. They're having to make hard choices00:15:36.948 --> 00:15:41.668about what will they afford that month, or will they even take that medication home with them?00:15:41.788 --> 00:15:45.968So lots of changes, lots of impact.00:15:45.968 --> 00:15:52.668To hear people come in and testify that this has not had harm was so00:15:52.668 --> 00:15:58.788disheartening and one of the reasons that we worked so hard as our coalition to move this forward.00:15:59.028 --> 00:16:04.968I think that's a great point to end on, and that if you're getting started with advocacy,00:16:05.348 --> 00:16:09.808one of the easiest ways to do it is to just go in, talk about your patients,00:16:10.048 --> 00:16:14.748talk about the impact of whatever the bill is and how it's going to affect your00:16:14.748 --> 00:16:16.128patients, because that's easy.00:16:16.328 --> 00:16:18.728That's what covered entities do so well.00:16:19.328 --> 00:16:22.128That's why we're doing this. Yeah, it's a great way to start.

Your Hosts

our team image
Logan Yoho

Meet Logan Yoho, PharmD, BCACP, 340B ACE, and co-host of the 340Banter Podcast. With nearly a decade of experience in the 340B industry, Logan is dedicated to helping health centers optimize and maintain successful, compliant 340B Programs. As Director of Advocacy and Education at FQHC 340B Compliance, he focuses on implementing entity-owned pharmacies and guiding advocacy efforts for 340B. Logan’s extensive background includes leading the pharmacy and 340B programs at Hopewell Health Centers, serving as Apexus 340B University Faculty, and chairing the Ohio 340B FQHC Consortium. Logan’s leadership and expertise have earned him multiple awards, and he brings a wealth of knowledge to every episode of 340Banter.

our team image
Chelsea Violette

Meet Chelsea Violette, PharmD, BCACP, 340B ACE, and your co-host for the 340Banter Podcast. With over a decade of experience in pharmacy and 340B Program management, Chelsea brings a wealth of knowledge to the table. As Chief Operating Officer at FQHC 340B Compliance, she works tirelessly to support health centers across the country, ensuring they have the tools and strategies they need to succeed. Chelsea’s hands-on experience as a 340B Consultant and Pharmacy Manager, combined with her expertise as a subject matter expert for the Apexus 340B Prime Vendor Program, makes her a trusted voice in the world of 340B compliance. Tune in for her practical insights, guidance, and lively discussions on all things 340B.

Want to Read along?

Download the Transcript

00:00:00.017 --> 00:00:05.377Today on 340 Banter, we're live from the 340B Midwest Regional Conference.00:00:05.777 --> 00:00:10.457I'm joined by Felicity. Chelsea couldn't be with us today, but today we want00:00:10.457 --> 00:00:15.377to talk a little bit about what we've been seeing in the states around provider reporting.00:00:15.797 --> 00:00:21.117I know both of our states, Maine and Ohio, have seen quite a bit of changes00:00:21.117 --> 00:00:24.897here recently. Let's talk about what we're really seeing with that.00:00:45.041 --> 00:00:49.121Awesome. Thank you for having me here. It has been wonderful to make the00:00:49.121 --> 00:00:53.521trip from Maine, and I did not have any trouble with my flight. So that was amazing.00:00:53.801 --> 00:00:59.421We have had a lot of work around 340B lately in Maine.00:00:59.641 --> 00:01:03.921We were a little bit late starting, and we started with transparency,00:01:04.221 --> 00:01:09.981womp womp, in our state. We took a little bit of a different pathway00:01:09.981 --> 00:01:11.121from some of the other states.00:01:11.281 --> 00:01:14.521Most states have started with protections, and we started with transparency.00:01:14.961 --> 00:01:18.941We were a little bit different there, too, where we started more along the lines00:01:18.941 --> 00:01:22.141of the American Hospital Association, good stewardship principles,00:01:22.141 --> 00:01:27.321more with a narrative and a calculation that focused on, you know,00:01:27.341 --> 00:01:28.981what was that true 340B savings?00:01:29.161 --> 00:01:33.501So the difference between what we would have paid on 340B and what we would00:01:33.501 --> 00:01:35.661have paid if we bought the drug at a traditional price.00:01:35.761 --> 00:01:40.521So a little bit unusual, but we've had an evolution that we'll talk about during the conversation.00:01:40.761 --> 00:01:45.621Ohio actually is going to end up following the same pathway.00:01:45.941 --> 00:01:50.101We originally had a contract pharmacy bill in the last session,00:01:50.101 --> 00:01:51.881but it didn't go anywhere.00:01:52.061 --> 00:01:59.301And then a unique thing happened, and I think this is a great topic to talk about within advocacy.00:01:59.581 --> 00:02:06.441It's a place people don't think about. We didn't have a provider transparency bill that was passed.00:02:06.641 --> 00:02:13.141As part of our budget process, our House version had nothing involving 340B transparency.00:02:13.481 --> 00:02:18.321Then, the Senate version came out with language for hospitals only.00:02:18.761 --> 00:02:19.801It went to conference committees, 00:02:20.042 --> 00:02:23.842and that's when they take both versions00:02:23.842 --> 00:02:27.122of the bill, the Senate version and House version, and they blend them together.00:02:27.302 --> 00:02:33.642When they did that at like 11 o'clock at night, they changed hospital to covered00:02:33.642 --> 00:02:35.882entity. So it now applies to everyone.00:02:36.162 --> 00:02:41.042We're in a similar boat where we're starting with transparency that starts next July,00:02:41.362 --> 00:02:47.382but we still have a contract pharmacy bill live and will possibly pass this session.00:02:47.382 --> 00:02:52.802We're hoping that we can get it passed and that I'm kind of viewing this00:02:52.802 --> 00:02:59.022in glass half full and that these transparency requirements can actually help00:02:59.022 --> 00:03:04.802us in where there's less accusations that the 340B program is opaque.00:03:04.802 --> 00:03:08.822Yeah, we definitely have had success with that in Maine.00:03:08.842 --> 00:03:14.002It was funny, our experience was that we passed the transparency legislation.00:03:14.302 --> 00:03:19.942Then the following year, we were working on our contract pharmacy protections00:03:19.942 --> 00:03:23.582and did not anticipate this.00:03:23.582 --> 00:03:28.242As we were doing our testimony for moving forward with the contract pharmacy00:03:28.242 --> 00:03:33.822protections, we had calls for more transparency, more transparency.00:03:33.822 --> 00:03:37.522We had not gotten through that. We haven't even got a report yet.00:03:37.782 --> 00:03:42.022We had not gotten through our first reporting, so it was well played.00:03:42.022 --> 00:03:46.922They did get more transparency added to our transparency reporting.00:03:47.102 --> 00:03:53.072They'll be updating now. Now ours looks both like Maine did originally,00:03:53.092 --> 00:03:55.032but adding some of the Minnesota measures.00:03:55.412 --> 00:03:59.412So looking at not just what the true savings are on what we're purchasing,00:03:59.612 --> 00:04:03.232but also adding in that margin that any retail pharmacy would have.00:04:03.232 --> 00:04:04.852So what did you sell the drug for?00:04:04.972 --> 00:04:09.532And then minusing your 340B cost from that. So it does inflate the 340B savings00:04:09.532 --> 00:04:14.032to add in a retail pharmacy margin, but then do reporting with those numbers.00:04:14.052 --> 00:04:18.292We were able to move the contract pharmacy protection process.00:04:18.917 --> 00:04:23.417A lot of it had to do with the fact that we were both protecting the state's00:04:23.417 --> 00:04:26.937safety net providers and also being transparent about what was going on.00:04:27.337 --> 00:04:31.897You mentioned Minnesota. That's the one transparency00:04:31.897 --> 00:04:35.737report that we've actually seen come out.00:04:35.797 --> 00:04:40.037So let's talk about that a little bit, and what we saw ther,e and the nuances00:04:40.037 --> 00:04:46.517with it. I would say a lot of information, but it's unclear if there's been a lot of action from it.00:04:46.617 --> 00:04:51.877I personally refer to a lot of what's coming out of these state transparency00:04:51.877 --> 00:04:55.517bills as state-funded pharma research, which is unfortunate, right?00:04:55.597 --> 00:04:59.617We do want to be transparent with what's happening in our 340B Program,00:04:59.617 --> 00:05:03.277but many of the states are not asking for narratives.00:05:03.357 --> 00:05:08.397They are asking about the numbers, but they don't tell the full story.00:05:08.537 --> 00:05:12.617Minnesota is one of those states where they've gotten lots of numbers,00:05:12.617 --> 00:05:17.317but no actual information from the covered entities coming back about the true00:05:17.317 --> 00:05:19.457importance of their 340B Programs.00:05:19.637 --> 00:05:24.137I think that's challenging for state legislators and administrators because00:05:24.137 --> 00:05:29.657they're dealing with so many topics. They don't understand the nuances00:05:29.657 --> 00:05:34.137of 340B, so getting the information from the00:05:34.419 --> 00:05:37.839the numbers is not going to make sense to them.00:05:37.999 --> 00:05:42.539I think that I'd much rather see when these bills go through,00:05:42.599 --> 00:05:46.839I'd much rather see a narrative be added to it if it's going to be there.00:05:47.439 --> 00:05:52.199When we see these come out, I think that's important when you're talking00:05:52.199 --> 00:05:57.579to legislators that you have a bill that's proposed, that you explain that this00:05:57.579 --> 00:05:59.759data doesn't mean much without context.00:05:59.759 --> 00:06:02.739It's very much like healthcare, right? What are we testing for?00:06:03.299 --> 00:06:06.619What are the results that we need to see, right?00:06:06.699 --> 00:06:10.359If you want to understand what the 340B Program is doing,00:06:10.779 --> 00:06:13.039numbers aren't going to tell the whole story.00:06:13.379 --> 00:06:16.559You have to have the narrative to go with it.00:06:16.559 --> 00:06:21.519In those transparency bills, it's really important that we have an opportunity00:06:21.519 --> 00:06:26.919to explain along with the numbers so that the legislators can understand,00:06:27.119 --> 00:06:30.359so that it becomes something meaningful and usable, right?00:06:30.419 --> 00:06:35.199If you just get a list of lab tests coming back, and you don't have the report00:06:35.199 --> 00:06:39.479that comes back from the doctor to go with it, it's not meaningful to you as a patient.00:06:39.479 --> 00:06:43.179That's very much what we're seeing in the states that are getting their reports00:06:43.179 --> 00:06:47.979back, that aren't having that narrative coming in from the covered entities00:06:47.979 --> 00:06:49.919to help with that explanation.00:06:50.219 --> 00:06:53.379We're really thinking about that.00:06:53.519 --> 00:06:58.299The other piece that we're thinking about, too, is that there are other stakeholders00:06:58.299 --> 00:07:02.359in the 340B Program who have opportunities to be transparent.00:07:02.359 --> 00:07:09.859Big kudos to Michigan, who introduced in their transparency bill this00:07:09.859 --> 00:07:14.899year, some manufacturer transparency and something for us all to think about, right?00:07:15.039 --> 00:07:19.159Because as the manufacturers are restricting the 340B Program,00:07:19.159 --> 00:07:23.719as they are pulling back those savings from the safety net in each of our states,00:07:23.959 --> 00:07:27.379where are they reinvesting? Where are those dollars going?00:07:27.659 --> 00:07:30.479I think that's00:07:31.106 --> 00:07:36.526only fair. We are equal, covered entities are equal stakeholders with manufacturers.00:07:36.786 --> 00:07:40.326So what's good for the goose is good for the gander. Yeah, we would love to00:07:40.326 --> 00:07:44.506see states having transparency measures to get explanations of,00:07:44.586 --> 00:07:49.766what is that savings now going towards? How are you supporting our communities?00:07:50.006 --> 00:07:53.526How are you expanding care for our patients? Letting us know,00:07:53.706 --> 00:07:58.486what are you now spending in our state to create access for our communities?00:07:58.486 --> 00:08:01.286Also, what are you spending on your marketing?00:08:01.526 --> 00:08:07.466What does it cost to manufacture these drugs, right? So let's have transparency all around.00:08:07.686 --> 00:08:10.346We're very much in support of transparency,00:08:10.346 --> 00:08:13.506but we think that it's important to have it for both parties.00:08:14.407 --> 00:08:18.927To build on that, what we've seen is that with the data from the Office of Pharmacy00:08:18.927 --> 00:08:21.647Affairs and the audits that they've been doing,00:08:22.127 --> 00:08:27.127manufacturers actually have a three times higher rate of repayment on audits00:08:27.127 --> 00:08:32.927to the covered entities than the covered entities do to manufacturers when there are audit findings.00:08:33.607 --> 00:08:38.207We recently just saw a manufacturer that was overcharging for the entire00:08:38.207 --> 00:08:39.987length of the 340B Program.00:08:40.147 --> 00:08:44.287Yeah, and that's disheartening, right? So from the very beginning of their participation00:08:44.287 --> 00:08:47.167in the program for the medications that they were supplying,00:08:47.387 --> 00:08:50.667they did not calculate the 340B price correctly.00:08:51.107 --> 00:08:53.907They had major repayments that they had to do.00:08:54.027 --> 00:08:58.147They went back just a little over a decade. For the rest of the time,00:08:58.307 --> 00:09:00.987which we've been in the 340B program for over three decades,00:09:01.387 --> 00:09:05.687it was, if you would like the rest of this money, please calculate it yourself and let us know.00:09:06.087 --> 00:09:11.027We, as covered entities, are held to a very high threshold.00:09:11.027 --> 00:09:17.787We believe that the transparency measures are important and should go all around.00:09:18.027 --> 00:09:22.467I would say another area that could be included in that would be the pharmacy benefit00:09:22.467 --> 00:09:28.187managers or PBM, because we're hearing more and more about their participation00:09:28.187 --> 00:09:30.687in the program and taking those savings.00:09:30.907 --> 00:09:34.827I think that would be fair as well to add. 00:09:34.947 --> 00:09:39.047We hear a lot of stories about PBMs coming in and saying what the program will00:09:39.047 --> 00:09:42.787cost if the contract pharmacy restrictions are lifted.00:09:42.947 --> 00:09:48.247Every time we ask the question, has the state seen savings00:09:48.247 --> 00:09:51.607in the last few years when the restrictions have been in place?00:09:51.607 --> 00:09:56.607Every time we ask that question, the answer has been no. It's curious that00:09:56.607 --> 00:10:01.747it will cost us more if we remove them, but we didn't save one when they were00:10:01.747 --> 00:10:04.007in place. So how does that work?00:10:04.187 --> 00:10:08.567That's the same for employers, too. They're using that same argument00:10:08.567 --> 00:10:13.027with employers that 340B makes your costs go up because you get less00:10:13.027 --> 00:10:16.387rebates, but we haven't seen their costs go down in the last five years with00:10:16.387 --> 00:10:18.207contract pharmacy restrictions. 00:10:18.449 --> 00:10:22.669It's been significant if you look at our contract pharmacy savings that00:10:22.669 --> 00:10:24.149covered entities are noticing.00:10:24.469 --> 00:10:28.569I do think that there's opportunities for transparency for all of the00:10:28.569 --> 00:10:29.829participants in the program.00:10:30.209 --> 00:10:34.169I think this is something to explore as you work on your advocacy.00:10:34.569 --> 00:10:40.349I do think it's good for us just to talk a little bit about advocacy in general,00:10:40.609 --> 00:10:48.729It's an ongoing conversation, and it's really important to be prepared when you go in.00:10:49.089 --> 00:10:54.629Yeah, exactly. What would you say if a state is coming up with advocacy00:10:54.629 --> 00:11:00.909or with a provider reporting bill, what would the advocacy discussion points,00:11:00.949 --> 00:11:02.849would you go and talk about it?00:11:02.949 --> 00:11:08.429I think what comes to mind for me is what transparency do we already have in00:11:08.429 --> 00:11:15.089place as covered entities? Yeah, and so that is something we really leveraged in Maine. 00:11:15.677 --> 00:11:19.297We talked a lot about that, right? We were able to keep the federally qualified00:11:19.297 --> 00:11:23.017health centers out of the reporting requirements because we talked about what00:11:23.017 --> 00:11:26.957we were reporting in UDS, and with our fiscal audits that we have to do annually.00:11:27.257 --> 00:11:32.277Also thinking about what is meaningful and really articulating that,00:11:32.777 --> 00:11:36.537making sure that you have the narrative in there as well, creating a strong00:11:36.537 --> 00:11:39.577coalition without creating division, right?00:11:39.657 --> 00:11:43.897We worked with the health centers and the other grantees, who work closely with the hospital.00:11:44.097 --> 00:11:49.237Even though we were able to articulate the nuances of the health centers,00:11:49.457 --> 00:11:55.177it was never in a conversation that was disparaging to another covered entity00:11:55.177 --> 00:11:56.717type. They weren't throwing them under the bus.00:11:56.957 --> 00:12:02.317This makes us unique, but no, never that this makes somebody else,00:12:02.317 --> 00:12:07.757you know, less a participant of this program, right?00:12:08.117 --> 00:12:11.817It's just that this is our federal obligation, so this is why we're doing00:12:11.817 --> 00:12:15.757this and helping others highlight how they show as well.00:12:15.937 --> 00:12:21.057I think that fiscal audit, that was something I didn't think about at first.00:12:21.057 --> 00:12:28.617I always bring up UDS, but our fiscal audit is reported to the federal government. It's published.00:12:29.057 --> 00:12:33.337Anyone can go pull up a fiscal audit from a health center,00:12:33.357 --> 00:12:37.137and it's proving that we're using the funds to meet the mission of the health center.00:12:37.137 --> 00:12:40.217We, as health centers, have a lot of transparency already.00:12:40.217 --> 00:12:46.297We have been successful in a number of states by articulating that to be able to00:12:46.657 --> 00:12:51.917support transparency, but say that we already have extensive transparency reporting,00:12:51.917 --> 00:12:54.617so we have been able to be exempted from the state requirements.00:12:54.617 --> 00:12:57.477Because again, like you said, we're already publicly published.00:12:57.817 --> 00:13:02.577Then from there, just making sure that as we're having these conversations,00:13:02.577 --> 00:13:06.757that there is a focus on yes, okay, we're having transparency, but if00:13:07.125 --> 00:13:10.345we don't have protections in the state for the contract pharmacy,00:13:10.505 --> 00:13:13.245how does this feed into that conversation as well?00:13:13.365 --> 00:13:17.725Using every moment of advocacy to help move things forward as well.00:13:17.845 --> 00:13:20.285We are fully in support of transparency.00:13:20.865 --> 00:13:24.125Here's how we're doing it. Here's what the program means to our community.00:13:24.325 --> 00:13:29.225Also, here's what the contraction of the program has meant to the community.00:13:29.385 --> 00:13:31.825How do we continue to work together? 00:13:32.065 --> 00:13:36.685I think if you have one of these bills coming up, talking about the transparency00:13:36.685 --> 00:13:41.865that we already do, being supportive of transparency is a good thing.00:13:42.085 --> 00:13:45.765We see that benefit, but we're already doing it.00:13:45.885 --> 00:13:50.545So talking about the workforce requirements, but then also talking about how00:13:50.545 --> 00:13:57.265if we're transparent, then we should be able to open that contract pharmacy access back up.00:13:57.265 --> 00:14:04.645So really talking about the impact there and how it's hurting your patients,00:14:04.785 --> 00:14:05.645which are their constituents.00:14:06.756 --> 00:14:12.296I think that's all, the whole thing is talking about how it affects the constituents.00:14:12.576 --> 00:14:16.116At the end of the day, it's the patients who are missing out.00:14:16.256 --> 00:14:19.296One of the things that was most disheartening to me,00:14:19.416 --> 00:14:23.276just as we're wrapping up, is when we were down in the state house doing00:14:23.276 --> 00:14:27.176testimony, people from different groups who were coming00:14:27.176 --> 00:14:30.076in and saying that this hasn't hurt patients.00:14:30.756 --> 00:14:38.076I was flabbergasted, and I have no poker face, so I was told not to sit in front of the camera.00:14:38.256 --> 00:14:42.996That was for a reason, because I'm sure I was all sorts of everything.00:14:43.356 --> 00:14:46.956I can't tell you, how many patients and we're,00:14:47.116 --> 00:14:53.756a step removed as consultants, how many calls we receive as the consultant,00:14:54.056 --> 00:14:58.396from our covered entities saying, we can't get this medication for our00:14:58.396 --> 00:15:02.296patients, even those from contract pharmacies, for the covered entities we work with.00:15:02.376 --> 00:15:08.456What are we supposed to do about a regular restriction00:15:08.456 --> 00:15:11.936comes in, how are we supposed to deal with this? How are we supposed to deal with this?00:15:12.056 --> 00:15:17.656Patients are being impacted because, yes, the medication is at the pharmacy,00:15:17.836 --> 00:15:21.796but especially with where we work, which is with the FQHCs.00:15:22.348 --> 00:15:27.028We were previously passing on that 340B price to the patients.00:15:27.028 --> 00:15:32.368If that's not at the pharmacy, we can't pass that on, which means the patient's00:15:32.368 --> 00:15:36.948not able to afford their medication. They're having to make hard choices00:15:36.948 --> 00:15:41.668about what will they afford that month, or will they even take that medication home with them?00:15:41.788 --> 00:15:45.968So lots of changes, lots of impact.00:15:45.968 --> 00:15:52.668To hear people come in and testify that this has not had harm was so00:15:52.668 --> 00:15:58.788disheartening and one of the reasons that we worked so hard as our coalition to move this forward.00:15:59.028 --> 00:16:04.968I think that's a great point to end on, and that if you're getting started with advocacy,00:16:05.348 --> 00:16:09.808one of the easiest ways to do it is to just go in, talk about your patients,00:16:10.048 --> 00:16:14.748talk about the impact of whatever the bill is and how it's going to affect your00:16:14.748 --> 00:16:16.128patients, because that's easy.00:16:16.328 --> 00:16:18.728That's what covered entities do so well.00:16:19.328 --> 00:16:22.128That's why we're doing this. Yeah, it's a great way to start.

Logo reading 340BANTER by FQHC 340B Compliance with a stylized microphone icon.

Subscribe Now for Exclusive Access

Don’t miss out on critical updates and game-changing strategies. Subscribe to 340Banter today and ensure your FQHC is always a step ahead in 340B compliance.

About FQHC 340B Compliance

340Banter is brought to you by FQHC 340B Compliance, a trusted partner in optimizing 340B Programs for Federally Qualified Health Centers nationwide. Their mission is to provide tailored resources to help health centers secure and optimize their 340B Programs, improving compliance and oversight. For more information, contact us!

Group of seven professionally dressed people standing and smiling against a white background.
Subscribe now

Find Our Podcast On Your Favorite Platform

Have Questions? Let's Talk.

Have a question for our team, topic suggestions, or want to be a featured guest? Reach out to us!

Smiling woman in a green blazer and man in a blue blazer standing side by side against a white background.
Logo reading 340BANTER by FQHC 340B Compliance with a stylized microphone icon.

Empowering Healthcare Professionals. Enhancing 340B Performance.